missouri coming back in june world of warships

My opinion will change if they insert bizarre or hard to complete requirements, but they haven't done that in the past for a campaign. Anyone who is going to buy Missouri is actually playing the game and can probably complete the missions easily.

They were convinced to give a fairer alternative to the crappy loot boxes, but they want to tie it to one of the cheesy campaigns that you usually can sleepwalk through.

You complete them while playing the game normally. Then they open it for purchase if you complete a campaign but people still howl.Īdmittedly, we don't know what the missions are, but the fact they called it a 'campaign' suggests it is the same as the previous campaigns - sink 5 ships, spot 20 torpedoes, etc. People howled about the loot boxes, which is understandable because you have no idea what you actually have to do to get the ship. not sure what you all are griping about this for? Hasn't everyone already committed to closing your wallets anyway? Why gripe about any of this if you aren't going to give anymore money to WG? I mean all the mission will be is a way for F2P or protest (while still playing) players to get some of WG's free stuff. I guess I would have to see what the mission requirements look like before deciding how bad this is really? Though.

Missouri coming back in june world of warships